Evolution of willpower

(from post to JCS-online @ 2011-04-25)

I have now much clearer form of some ideas also expressed in my old letters, which I would not write here - these are not tries to convince a "non-believer" in existence of will, but rather to give a stronger base to those, who believe in existance of it.

If we consider that rough simplified form of psyche and all other matter is explained as such (I use the framework similar to one of Schopenhauer here):

• Idea - any kind of cognitive experience, state of things, which is projected to cognition.
• Will - any part of this state of things, which one seriously wants to be materialized, with this attribute of being a will.

So there is some image in mental projection; it consists of images, some of which we know to be materialized, some of which we want to be materialized and some of which we just consider or have there, the latter we can call dreams. We attribute beauty and achievableness to dreams to choose, which ones will get this new attribute to get wills - which ones attract our willpower.

We see that this experience we have about things materialized is very similar in conginitve structure to the ones we experienced as ideas for willpower, which are materialized now - materialization of will roughly means that there appears a very similar structure to the one, which was attributed as being a will, now attributed as being a material form. So the existence of will can be defined as ability to make our personal ideas, non-attached projections, into the ones, which are projected to us by reality itself. This means that those ideas actually "make sense" - and the will makes sense.

Now we can define an evolution of willpower: this is a tendency of survival of those entities, which more strongly materialize their will in given environment. As the ideas actually make sense, the will itself is a fundamental thing, which is just what it is - if there is a projection into mind of actual experience, the will is ability to create the new experience, which first appears as projected outside-direction and then, in very similar form, as projected from outside to inside. What makes this fundamental is the connection - the materialized form is essentially the same thing, what was initially projected, and the connection itself was meaningful in sense that we actually experienced it as something to become reality.

So, the evolution of will, if there is a lots of often conflicting will in this world, makes up the evolution of all things:

• There is a tendency to survive for things, which can actually create their inner projection into real projection (get some support from external world to project certain things to their mental eye) - so from all matter, in which the experience could be fully random and unrelated to actual state of matters; where an engineer could use those forms of matter we experience as will as compounds, which would have different function that making those things into reality, the reality itself - or evolution - has still made those cognitive compounds to be precisely what they feel.
• The survival is affected by conflicting will - thus, complete survival is possible for forms, which do not attract wills in opposite directions, their will must synergize by other wills so that the actual change in reality allows all sides to see precisely the projections they want; thus, either the dream of experiencer must change to fit the big dream or the big dream must change.
• As will starts from dreams and it takes least amount of energy to synergize it on dream level, the survival is stronger for beings, which can communicate their dreams - before they get to wills or more importantly before they start materializing - and play their dreams out in believable ways, so that they know, where each dream actually leads, when they try to materialize it.
• This means that the forms of matter, which can make up big dreams together, share parts/roles of their big dreams and then dream about their roles and big dreams together in such way that those big dreams fit perfectly into bigger will they can't change, will survive.
• My point: this is fundamental law, not some human-centric social law.

On reality of experience

(post to JCS-online @ 2011-04-26)

I give you some very simple logic of things I've written about in longer ways.

Take three statements:

A: "Everything is made from matter" => "Human beings are made from matter" ("everything" here is all that moves, "human beings" thus belong to everything)

B: "Human beings have experience" ("experience" here is cognitive experience, such as feelings, thoughts or hallucinations, but also all that is sensed - things projected to mental eye)

C: "Matter has experience" (could be read: some matter has experience)

Now:

A /\ B => C

not C => not A \/ not B

These are logic everyone can check.

A: Matter was once defined as what we can feel and touch; being materialist then meant that there are no invisible fields or parallel worlds. Later, matter started to involve invisible fields and other things, until it now covers everything known and unknown that moves (to "move" is to change as meant here, thus mathematical truth or eternal laws themselves are not matter; curvature of spacetime is connected to matter and expressed through it, so it's about matter if we be a bit general). This is clear that human beings are made from matter, even if we might have missed some forms of matter or some ways of matter; also the deeper soul can be eternal - it probably is, the deeper soul is eternal laws.

B: "Human beings have experience". Now there are many, who say it's not so - in fact, philosophers of all times have almost generally agreed that this is the only truth what we can know for sure: I have some experience. Experience is direct, it's almost as a priory knowledge. Some more coherency-seeking physicalists have agreed in not B as they want not C and can't agree not A, so they argue for not B, but let's say that's nonsense. More clever ones follow a science fiction author in saying that B comes from "mathematical complexity", which is formed from matter, but let's be clear that if this kind of mathematical complexity resolves into feelings, then first it's not math, because in math you can't conclude any feeling or experience from any set of theorems about matter and it's states, but even if it was math or is some "higher math" we haven't reached yet, it's still a cosmological principle - then it's just another way to say that certain patterns in matter are experiences. And then, follows, human beings have experience.

C: "Matter has experience" is what is generally not believed by "real scientists" and "smarter" ones say that thus, "human beings have experience" is also false. This is a proven fact that "A /\ not C => not B" and I have read quite strong proof from physicist (written in non-mathematical language), but from this proof it trivially follows that "B => C \/ not A" and then, "B /\ A => C". Estonian proof I refer to is here: http://www.kirikiri.ee/article.php3?id_article=124 ..he tries to prove that human beings have no experience and that experience is myth. But for me it was the last stone to say that matter has experience.

What I see as line, how the wrong conclusion was made:

1. "Everything is made from matter" was an answer to claims about many invisible entities, like ghosts. Many top scientists fought for that to get rid of church, which had started to kill innocent people etc. So it became messed up with articles about physics, chemistry and other cutting-edge science texts and was told by many, who had serious authority as creators of the new kind of technologies and methods. Matter was meant to be physical.

2. "There is no soul" seemed to be simple claim, which simplified human beings. It was simple, because if you believe only in matter everywhere it's simpler to believe that human beings are "the same".

3. Now, proving that human beings are "the same", the claim was made that you can explain activities of them just by looking causal connections and as those causal connections are all that happens, you can look rules of them without messing this up with subjective language of feelings. This was not meant to be truth about reality, but it was part of scientific method and therefore did not need proof of correctness (as it didn't state anything), but only strong arguments of it being effective method for research. This is effective to not try to explain movements of matter as humanly feelings, but to state objectively what is seen and to express it mathematically. We can express patterns of feelings mathematically, talking about form, and foresee future feelings through that - and by giving any feeling a mathematical name, we do not need to talk about feelings when we search for strict patterns. This kind of language won't express what matter is, but only what it does in terms of the same matter. It's not the essence, it's the form.

4. Then, after professionally starting to think only in terms of movement, it became common bias of labor workers to start thinking in terms of method. As a foundational base of their thinking, it did not need a proof of also being true - it suddenly became "simple" for any experienced labor worker, even if it's not a natural first-guess (which would be simple for any other human); this is not the evolutionary truth programmed into us to survive - it's manmade truth about how to programm our minds to get into objective research.

5. The bias strengthened by getting into textbooks and scientific works until noone simply doubted it being true.

6. Scientists started to simulate scientific method to show it's validity, especially using claims of simplicity and guess that other sides have no proofs that their thoughts are invalid. This is especially simple, because when method of philosophy and math is strong proof, method of physics is weak proof or inductive proof - this is philosophical truth that we have experience. This is proof of physics that "this is simpler to explain real events like that" and when used for something already explained by philosophers (that we have feelings, which is absolutely sure and proven) to explain it away by weak argumentation of "simplicity", "coherence of theory" etc. (where assumption of feelings does not break any coherence, it just adds some elements, which are not included in theory because of research method of that science, so the "coherence" is rather "completeness" - this is not there as it would break the completeness of our theory); it's obviously out-of-scope topic for physicians. Then, if we say that feelings are there, then they must be other way to explain some or all movements of matter in another language, which more closely connects to essence of matter.

On objective reality of dreams

(post to JCS-online @ 2011-07-22)

 

I make a statement:

Dreams always accurately reflect objective information about (physical) reality.

This statement is fundamentally true and should be basis of research about dreams and mental states. It's true also when using paradigm of physicalism - and for now, we should always consider single statements based on physicalism, proving those with any part of it and then ignoring incoherence with other parts - because any such incoherence shows incoherence in physicalism itself.

The basis for this assertion is simple:

• The reality we see around us, is thought as reflection of objective world. The knowledge we get from mental image of our sense data is objective, because we accurately map it to objective reality - but even if maps were inaccurate, sense data would still be data about world around us.
• "Sense data" in dreams, in the same way, objectively reflects minimally our brain chemistry, which is enough to say that given that our map would be correct, we could use dreams to get very real, objective data about our world.
• This brain chemistry or rather mental state is in interaction with world around us - sense data, memories, but also with surroundings on particle level. For example, magnetic fields have some effect upon our dreams.

To gain that, we should work on study of dream realities and very precise understanding of the laws - what can happen in dreams, what energies it takes, what happens in dreams without using any energy. The positive aspect is that anyone studying that does not have to have any particular position in questions we are arguing about here. Also, to form a coherent picture - interactions between dreams and reality should be understood.

Dreams, probably, have an underlying "energetic" world and associations. Why we see dreamscape as being similar to everyday reality and why some think that it's just a random collection of memories is the case that usually our mind uses partial information from senses to build the larger reality - if we see one side of a crystal ball, we actually see also another as our mind will try to fill the gaps. In dreams, there are occasional cases, where we can see the process - sense data from outside world will be used and gaps are filled quite randomly, for example people talking in kitchen could appear as crowd of people in dream. So, our dream symbolism is reflected in how we fill the gaps and reflects the fact that we take everyday reality somewhat more seriously than dream reality - we spend much effort to fill the gaps in the way expected by everyday reality and then we use it in dreams, it's like association method. It's actually very interesting case about how we always make up our vision of world - would it be darker room with some flashing lights, we would similarly make up some random images based on associations.

Here, the zen meditations of not making so much illusion up would actually make us see the reality behind the dreams. It's like that we only need the correct symbols - having set of symbols on Tarot cards, we could choose quite correct ones, but without having such framework we would not get anything out from the same kind of intuition. We can make up precise images if our mind is flexible to let it be led by intuition or if it contains all symbols needed by that intuition. We see so badly in our dreams.

But the dreamworld, is it "less real" just because it's subjective? Just because it's subject's mind? No, because if we have objective information about subject's mind, we have some objective information - what happens in my brain, is totally subjective, but it's not less objective than what happens in an ocean, even if that ocean is billions of times more massive. And things happening in some brain can very much interact with outside world, moving mountains - this is rather important data. And the lack of physical world view right now is to create a topological image of this world.

We know that how we cognitively see things in our brain, how they happen, is very different from how we see those things in physical projection, with physical devices, as material structure of brain. Therefore, physical data together with physical theories does not contain that information in any kind of accessible form, which is not dependent upon if the hypothesis that they actually are the same is true or false. Therefore, we would need a space model, where mental imagery is connected with actual world - this can be more precise, involving interactions between brain states and imagery and some specific areas of brain, but it can also be more general, involving interactions between human being as a whole and, for example, their body or a world. But to get how this kind of space looks like - we can't compare location and size of physical reality and this mental dimension and this is actual, physicialism-compatible, fact. We also have much more relevant data if we consider the both in one space. For example, we could not say, when someone plans to come to meeting by studying their physical appearance, but we can by studying the internals of their brain - through physical medium, probably, but clearly this information is not accessibly there until we take some mentally-justified action. After that we have some new information about probable events in physical reality, also. So, if we would like to have more complete image of some situation, we would consider those mental images of brain a real part of physical-mental reality, creating a more complex map with more dimensions. And, this way of gathering data is verifiable and experimental - what I described is also a real test that we can actually get some real information, using our mental imagery in physical sense, because we were able to formulate the question and use the reply to say something about the physical world.

Also, the "size" of things is actually not a physical reality - physical information about the brain is not necessarily smaller than physical information about the room, in any sense, which would make it also inferior, and in another, as much physically valid, coordinate system it could also be larger. So the statement that dreams are more illusion that sense data is simply unjustified.

Call to ecotechnology!

(from letter to JCS-online 2011-07-30)

So, we see the big step done by Apple. Apple why? Because of how their technology feels - it feels better to have it on your hands. It feels cleaner, nicer, blends better to your hands. And we have all this ecomarket, things which sense better, they feel better; better food, better water, less pain done when creating it, more respect to the surroundings. And this is the future of technology.

Say some evil people create the old technology - they get oil from forests, every day they take down a lot of Amazon's rain forests, a lot of forests, to get oil from soil. They destroy to create ..but why? Just because soon we might not need oil anymore, we have electric cars and new ways to get electricity - old generation of idiots is going to make money, going to sell as much as they can because it ends, before the oil is not a synonym of power anymore. And then, the money system will collapse and they have nothing at their hands, just a bloody history of destruction.

But even Apples iPhone - how much is destroyed if it's manufactured; how bad it is to our skin and blood to keep it on our hands. So the next generation of technology - we see that Apple is selling. But we can make another quality criteria. We can say - make it blend to ecosystem. Make a computer bugs can eat, make a computer, which purifies an air at your home; make a computer, which is manufactured by converting nuclear waste into something useful; manufactured in such way, which turns waste gases and waste into something good to nature - make the manufacturing process good; make it so that keeping it at your hands will miraculously make you a little bit more healthy, feel a little bit better. And then prove it's so. And you're the next best seller - throw it all away, the evil people, who destroy the world to create some goods; who destroy so many goods to make just some.

Or think - if you die, you be born here back, to another place. And then you have all that waste as a burden, you will fight against what you created like an idiot; why not leave it undone at first place?

Synchronicity for atheists

To unify, we need proofs to spiritual things, and not necessarily leading to deepest spirituality, but just to better understanding of causes and effects. This is a proof that nature does protect itself in intelligent ways and supports the ones, who support it. This text could be a lot clearer, but it's still a way to complete proof, which I had in mind, and which can be built from here (and combining with my other texts, the base idea gets much stronger).

In all universes, where overlapping growing processes can exist (and randomly become into existence), the Universe must be a total synergy.

This means - in all possible paradigms, which describe the same reality from different aspects, in all possible ways to describe, measure or sense, one must see total synergy between events.

Growing process is the one, which has homeostasis and forks for once in a while. This means - it has a pattern, which recreates a variant (mutation) of itself in somewhat later time, and sometimes two. For any f(t, z) there will be f(t+m, g(z)) and f(t+n, h(z)) where f is function of any complexity and z identifies a part of physical information plus mutation data and t is time. If one mutation is, for any reason, better than another and there is any tendency to evolve into this better feeling, then there is also some direction - about this, I've written before and this would make this math too complex. The case that processes can overlap - several processes use the same parts of physical information - will be main synergy engine, which makes the One-God-effect or Jungian style synchronicity a must-be, and karma laws follow easily.

Basically, the synergy engine follows from the following:

• All processes, once formed (like crystal growth or any kind of emotion-signal patterns, which biological microorganisms in earth air and human cells carry all over the physical level of world-brain), will evolve into better self-protection or be destroyed.
• Better self-protection is mutual self-protection, each of such processes protects:
• In case of forking ("getting children") or growth ("two overlapping children"), forked processes protect each other.
• Each process protects all processes, which protect itself, and processes, which protect those processes and so on.
• Each process destroys all processes, which destroy processes like itself or processes protected by itself.
• Each process empowers processes, which empower itself - mutual synergy.

So, processes starting from very basic physical processes start to synergize. Synergy is co-operation, using common timing, rhythms, common inputs like stars and planets, and common goals, to operate together.

Funnily, if all basic particles of matter wholly decided by themselves, how to move, but were able to carry some information to each other and "suggest" interesting solutions most probably tested for at least a while - only a few rules of movement were enforced -, and each particle wanted to have some specific things around itself once for a while, as large as possible, then we would not have anything like "force" acting from one particle to another but the _force_ would _evolve_ from the core need of creating those common structures - more synergistic and synergy-supporting particle cluster would be "listened to" by more clusters, then the ones, which could synergize the most of different patterns existing in this universe would have the sharpest power, listened by the most - and in this way, it is purely natural, if you see some people on street in perfect synergy making sense exactly in your current situation or if songs from radio just read your mind for a few months. The girl who plays the song might just create some playlists and let them running there, but synergy between you and here, even if you've never met, but you did meet the same person, song or the same stars at sky, the same clock and rhythm, you just belong to the same thing - then, when you think something, it is a part of larger process and this is perfectly normal if radio will answer that thought or do it three months or more, constantly and reliably. And all the rest is normal ..world just is in perfect synergy, you can see it in whatever way you see the world - if you are not in synergy with it, then it will mirror-reflect your misunderstanding, but if you are, it will surprise you, make the wind blow for you and the stars shine for you, things just happen and they happen all right. And this is plain math - very few properties of the system make this kind of synergy unavoidable effect, with mathematical certainty.

If our world moves into more happiness, using the free will, and love is will to happiness of you and others, then happiness and whatever actions needed to create it are supported by natural laws, winds, rains, random people you see on street and people you don't even sense telepathically, but who just do the right move on the fly never noticing it ..just, animals in the forest, ants and the whole reality from large to small, from alive to non-alive, from wind molecules to microorganisms in wind, they all support this move by their perfect synergy ..but only if you are so strongly in synergy yourself, listening to them all, that this is real, you realistically love, not imagine you loving; if it really listens the heart and mind. So, this moment will feel like if you have the whole power of the whole world - if the synergies need you, if you support the what-must-happen, the synergies protect your will, because of all the complex process, your will works like magic. And, funnily - the inner condition of ability and real happening of self-sacrifice if situation needs that, in certain cases, can be just the condition what renders it unnecessary ..it does not ask if you believe in God or not; it does not ask if you believe in synergy or not, it does not ask if you believe in love or not - it just knows all the case about you to know that in this specific moment you do this specific move, then it moves you to this situation needing this specific move. You be part of millions, billions of synergies all made up through evolution and your main mission - how to serve them all at once. The other people, also in those synergies ..and if those million synergies control most of earth, it's all their interplay, then making a move important, perfect and needed to all of them at once will give you quite a total power for a moment of doing this move. If you be able to synthesize, never really being hurting any of your supporting force, extending your force to new synergies and finding the way to seriously and really do things important for more - to synergize it all, the large powers, not all the small human affairs, which often do not have all the power of natural forces, magic, good luck and random events support behind those, but the real true things ..love is the greatest force on the planet and real, full-featured love with all the emotion and wisdom, this is the true magic, which supports you constantly in ways you do not even imagine. And it sees, the synergies themselves are not cause-effect, but they just coincidence, they can be goal-effect or parallel-effect or they just be, hundreds of years going like a movie ..at least some aspects of those stories. In case you play your role in important stories, you search and understand, you have the right genes, right luck and right place-and-time of birth for this specific story, the right soul and the right past lives, the right culture and the right instincts, then you play your part if you are never heard about the story but also if you have. Human being is just one synergy, one part, one smaller synergy to be fit into all those larger synergies - spirits, invisible creatures - which control the land and the sea, forests, stars, night and days. It's from smallest to largest - hyper-complex growing synergies through all the tensions trying to play together, to find the larger patterns, which fit the accepted pattern variants of all of them. And for each synergy is myriad of it's processes, visible or invisibly there, made of genes, memes, or signal patterns of microorganisms in air communicating with human cells, all those processes have similar kinds of ethical base rules for all the rest, other synergies - we all serve each others, empower each others and this is our strength and energy, otherwise we get to tension and wind will blow against us and the sun will go behind the clouds. That's very funny understanding, but only this really explains magic - it's not one force, one thing, one logic, but it's the whole world answering the true heart and will just because it wants. And the whole world constantly evaluating the feeling of love of all creatures, each synergy looking for some aspect, would it appear in this specific condition, is it there - and so the perfect love, constantly evolving love, constantly listening and accepting love, the true love will make miracles to happen. Because normally, normal physical laws and principles are the conditioning of God's laws, they keep the karma game going on, but the love game itself does not always have to follow all those, because it creatively loves - love removes the need for rules, even in this small-particle world, even in places, where we always see the constant physical laws. And this, mathematically, this is what you get just by thinking - those growing overlapping processes creating synergies and seeking for better feeling, if they listen each others based on how good are the moves for every force at once, if they empower their own empowerers and empowerers of their empowerers, then they seek more and more synergy to solve all wishes and wills of synergized loving creatures at once, until every one of those feels more and more naturally godly or supported, even if the same event means five different wish-fulfillings or gifts for five different beings, then the best will will be most listened and in surprising ways ..not by other people you tell those to, but by forces of nature at once, cooperating to create a miracle, a complex set of interconnected miracles to fulfill your wish ..just because the wish is meant to do the best to you and all the others, or just some of the ones you love - it's in synergy, not a lone, not separate.

Dharma of matter

This is repost, as I bring here some older materials, so repeats a bit :) Here is more mathematical idea between the lines; about engineering and economics..

synergy = energy + exergy; anergy is absence of both.

This is to say that tao = yang + yin. There is no antithesis of tao, but there is lack of it.

Here this is the background of this game of words..

Therefore, synergy transcends energy, but through exergy, if user is a part of system and no external "consumer" ..through "consuming", we produce synergy to ourselves, through producing long-term anergy to a tool (it is in less-synergy state after trashing than the matter was before creating), and anergy to the battery we are using. We must get rid of this paradigm of "consuming" energy through having it to be "created" by producing anergy and "consumed" by producing energy, but through adding exergy we don't need anergy at all. As we always produce more anergy than energy, because of losses on transfer and producing and consuming, this is a way to lower synergy, this means anergy and this means chaos to world, but we must make all matter of Earth to go into higher synergy; thus, as synergy is energy+exergy, it transcends energy and is thus higher form of energy as it's creation does not produce anergy anywhere; producing energy without producing exergy we produce anergy, which is in higher degree than energy produced, and thus we move world to inevitable anergy direction, which is not the direction of evolution and life. We can call love, the creativity, the process which is used to create synergy, and the process itself moves "battery" of brain itself into higher synergy, so using this battery we also charge it as this process itself is exergy process, inside out, and thus we generate only synergy, without polar anergy - anergy is polar of half synergy, an energy.

From greek (energia, sünergia, anergia, eksergia in Estonian are the words, thus -ia ending):
syn prefiks - together
en prefiks - into
ex - out from
erg - work
an - without (almost "apart")
ia suffiks - state, quality, act

Using binary:
00: Anergy - state, quality, condition or act of not working.
01: Exergy - state, quality, condition or act of working for others (serving, as you do).
10: Energy - state, quality, condition or act of working for yourself.
11: Synergy - state, quality, condition or act of working together.

Here the articles (not so common words):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exergy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anergy

This means perpetuum mobile is possible in case it's user is part of it, so that nothing comes in and nothing goes out. As this is impossible, it must simply use all natural outside forces for it's own sake and produce responses, which are good for those processes, moving towards global synergy. It's very neutral activity as it produces "competition of higher synergy" and the ones left behind will fall, but neutral as status quo does not need to be aggressively changed in radical ways - everything can grow together, economics can grow (in quality and price, not quantity - workers of quantity should move to jobs on quality, so that they won't produce waste, but do the creation for raising synergy for all). When things built last 100 times more (and some old machines have their 100-year guarantee times passing and still as new, whereas Bernays work made it so that similar things not last for a few years), but constant growth of quality is good for everyone - less money, but as much more value of money, and thus win-win. At Bernays time his job might have been a necessity, but now the polar opposite is new necessity as situation has changed and we have less resources.

Paradigm change needs math to be re-engineered so that the optimums would be synergy optimums, not energy optimums without anergy factors counted. From this new paradigm, "production" and "consumption" of energy as we now know, become a little bit more complex, but raising the synergy becomes simpler and the optimums yield growth, not destruction. Sustainability is actually just the measure of synergy, like GDP is measure of economics, but better (on material - simple to engineer -, emotional - harder to engineer - and intellectual - quite hard to engineer).


Nassir Taleb describes some terms as fragility, antifragility and convexity as such in his works ..trivial things, in a sense, but very well-described (I have read some intros to that). Indeed, a good system should win from all natural forces - good material should attract molecules on correct places after losing some and on use, it should go stronger instead of being weared off; and on production, use and garbaging, the whole process should somehow serve environment. We need not fast computers, but reliable ones, for now - and actually, then, we can choose materials as easily as we can choose them when building house. And I have an idea that any molecule and other field structure has a kind of "experience", for example, if you take some metastructure of brain and use it in building computer, you can actually "build" some feeling or cognitive structure of brain, and it affects well-being of surrounding fields (which are, in sense, compassionate) ..and Earth field might be one of such. Then it's natural to hypothesize that dharma as Indians did use it also means "not being enslaved" for a matter, which is building correct internal synergy (and love), thus making the material stronger and more supported by surrounding fields and luck. With my background, this makes perfect sense :)

Here - theoretically, you can sell thing, which lasts 100 times more, with 100 times higher prices, and build it with (kind of) the same cost. It would be new market, slowly entering, first for the rich(?) ..because this is the actual change we need right now. Those 99% of workers, then, who are released from work, can start science work on different parts of this product or others, and there is actually a lot of work to do. Accumulating, if this is a tool, net value of production of other tools with it will virtually go smaller, as the price can be measured in correlation of this "high market" with old, "low market", even if in absolute terms the price does not change. It's just heading that way, then. People could start to slowly buy the new-quality stuff or move to new-quality markets themselves to be able to buy it. Then it would be correctly seen through GDP. Then, tax system could start taxing for all the anergy produced to nature, with cost of re-creation of synergy, and indeed, the old markets would pay 100 times more of this tax; this can be done on all markets, where growth is occurred (growth in terms of quality, growing mature, not quantity, growing bigger). Tax systems could be altered funnily if people start to get paid for learning - each exam taken gives some money, and exams are indeed in direction, which could make them quality-producers. This is to keep them working, not revolting, as people tend to do if having too much time, and not stopping doing work inside production system - but they would like to do something sensible, not just learn for 8 hours per day, and this sensible thing would be quality and reliability analysis, basically the research job, which tends to grow from educational jobs (and if learning is paid, then teaching is paid, and then people can grow into teachers if this is well-paid). As analytic abilities of people are well-known, they could be solving actual parts of scientific problems, with those parts generated by computers, so that it all would measure as real work. Because generation of synergy is work of creativity and love, and this could start this way. Then, as money is the matter, it would also be pointless to do someone else's schoolwork. Funny growth, but growth - actually there is unlimited amounts of theoretical work and having the "school-system" working as something, where anyone could buy answers, and anyone could get paid by giving acceptable answers, or re-giving so that alternatives could be checked for equality and by other measures ..and system could always just generate questions in complex ways, which do not let the answers be autogenerated ..okay, maybe there are better ways to get people creative, but from information society there inevitably comes the creation society, and evolution takes care of that - as people without brain areas supporting writing and reading died out when writing and reading became common. Didn't exactly die, but just the patterns of birth did change.

Dharma is love

Meaning of dharma, meaning of karma, and relationship between dharma and karma

In this free-will Universe, each particle (smallest compound), each mind and the Whole - all have their free will, all have their conditioned dynamics, and each have their cognitive space or condition. Condition can be desired or undesired.

Act of free will is what it is - it's a field of desire. As stronger the field, as more stronger it's effect upon everything contained inside field of attention. Desire, therefore, affects the desires around it, and the solution for desire-field translates to will. Will is the force, and everything always happens according to will - we can never say it does not happen according to our will, but we can say that we are unable to will what we desire.

Therefore, the study of how to build up better will - will, which more closely meets those desires - is as important as other aspects of growing willpower.

As Universe is a free-will Universe and everything happening here happens because of will, it's important to see, how will is formed.

One and Many

In middle of it all, there is an entity we shall call "One". It's as opposing "one" to "many". We currently agree, that there is One, which is upon everything, and it's omnipresent and omnipotent in means that it's everywhere at the same time and as all the rest is part of it, it's will is all the will. This will has an eternal core - will, which never changes. This core is uncountable - we see it inside every thing, but we also see it as a whole, One upon every thing. Thus, One is actually what we can not count, but the One inside any thing is the same as the One in it's eternal one-ness. This is the core will, which sets up the goal, and all the rest of free will is feeling as good as close it is to the goal at any given moment.

Let's now look at the many. Many are particles, and they form a cosmic hierarchy, of particle families. We shall call those particles souls. Smallest physical particles are the physical particles, but there are also larger particles. Every particle is positioned as "field of attention", and when they have effect upon something, they can turn into point field - as smaller the area of attention, as stronger the effect of it's desire on this area. This area is a field, and this field of each particle weakly covers the entire Universe, but as closer you get to it's point of focus, as stronger it's attention at that point - this is the closest description to reality.

Now, how One relates to some of Many? It relates as the deepest, most fundamental will - and this will is the same for All, but as each of Many has different matrix (and all those Matrixes in total, when added together, give a "White Matrix", which is the matrix of One), and through this different matrix, the "equilibrium states" or solutions to this matrix are also somewhat different.

This means - matrixes are like multidimensional "wavelengths", as it can be seen, which makes it most understandable, what I mean with "White".

What the matrix defines?

Matrix of soul is the ultimate pleasure pattern of that soul. It defines first the rhythyms of this soul, which could go through transformations of it's surroundings, with all kinds of "vibrations", which all are not just sinusoid wavelengths, but complex curves with very different properties, of everything inside the field of it, and as those patterns could partially be called "complexes" (in sense that they form from reactions and complementary reactions, each forming reaction to previous one so that the state of effect of those reactions is always in field of it's near-desired states), but after those complexes are all "solved" into certain energies, created together by particles of souls, which have these energies as their natural energies, it forms a constant pattern, which keeps some of desired state constantly formed, so that the soul can "dance" with others ..and this dance, called "synergy", is what each soul desires, and forming this dance with others is what is called "solving it's karma" - it grows it's soul essence into a knowledge, which allows it to constantly keep it's desires in such states, which form more and more synergy, and this is the ultimate creativity.

There are a few words to be defined to continue:
anergy - this is lack of tao, and lack of energy, and lack of exergy.
energy - this is "work for oneself", which is a force to get surroundings into more desired state. yang.
exergy - this is "serving", which is a force to get itself into more desired state of surroundings. yin.
synergy - this is "the solution", which is energy+exergy, this is the perpetuum mobile, tao.

Perpetuum mobile - Universe itself, as it moves forever, and particle, as it moves forever. Conservation laws forbid perpetuum mobiles, which can constantly give energy away, but they permit the one, which works only inside, keeping itself going and giving nothing away. In reality, it's near-impossible that no energy moves in or out, and here we will also go through that part.

First, some syllables:
an - lack of, without.
en - into oneself.
ex - from oneself.
syn - together (both into and from).
ia (as in energia) - state, condition, act.

The current paradigm is that when we produce anergy in synergistic system, then we can use this release to produce energy in another system, but this is with some losses over producing, transmission and use, thus this paradigm ultimately leads us towards total anergy (in slower or faster manner). But exergy is conditioning system in such way, that it supports surrounding environment and surrounding environment supports that system. Organic systems actually feel good in wind, water, air and other elements of environment - through exergy, they will heal, this means, go into more energetic states. If something is exergetic in such way, outside systems will acutally "heal" or "fix" it, because it's will - it's energy - does not harm them. So the question, energetically, is solving desires of yourself and the surroundings in such way that it creates synergy pattern, and then using your desire to move towards this synergy and to keep it going - this is dharma. As all particles are small souls, finding dharma of them is to mean that energy inside those systems or the effect that they produce energy in their user does not mean anymore producing anergy in some other place, and then it's not self-destruction programme. This is one ultimate way, how karma works - by finding this harmony of desires, solving matrixes together, we can build things, which get stronger and more charged when used. Inside material systems like that, anyone using them will actually go into the system and form a part of it's synergy, and what they carry away, only that part of energy and matter has to be reproduced - all other matter moves inside a "dance", and because synergy transcends energy, no anergy is needed to be produced in any other "system".

Changing paradigm in such way that we won't see energy as something to be "created" and "consumed", but instead we see synergy creation and movement strategies and wisdom to get it constantly higher (and human element inside that infrastructure provides the creativity, because creativity is only resource needed to keep it going and keep it strong even when surroundings change over time and exergy needs to be re-invented). Then, surrounding field, which feels matter inside it from it's cognitive aspect, and inner love between it's particles, and lack of karma, which comes from following dharma - the rules, which guarantee, that system moves from pleasure state to pleasure state, no matter which particles you use for this measurement ..in energy, a particle will form exergy around it, which might produce anergy, and then keep it until discharged; in exergy, a particle will surround to surrounding, until charged with too much negative energy (displeasure) and then using that to force exergy to surroundings again; in synergy, a particles constantly keep the synergy pattern solved, which means that for each particle, there is maximum energy and maximum exergy at the same time, and thus there is no "discharged batteries" - no synergistic matter outside is moved to anergy, state of dischargement, or chaos -, and then it a perpetuum mobile in effect, as our Universe could more strongly be - moving from state of displeasure by different energies (desires) being in tension and struggle, to pleasure of different desires directed to the same pattern at all the time, so that all desires could be one with will.

Matrix, basically, defines the pleasure states, and as the motivating force is the free-will desire, we have to take all pleasure-state solutions to matrix, and build things, where matrices or all souls are constantly solved. Large souls, as soul of Earth or soul of Universe, surround it all, and where they sense this pleasure inside, they start supporting it - this effect is called a good luck. Thus, Universe itself will repair such kind of soul patterns, so that they become stronger when used, and when they lose some molecules, it will come back by karma or be replaced, and particles are probably also replaced with more and more fitting particles, and such kind of pattern is in harmony and state of flow, like a very strong material with enormous amounts of willpower to keep it in this equilibrium, this willpower coming from both inside (through energy, and all matter has constant amount of energy or desire) and outside (through exergy, this outside will is "attracted"). Of course, there can still be other reactions taking place, and other things, which might have incompatible matrices, and those two, where nearby or giving attention to each others, might be weakening this willpower - so, we have to find larger and larger exergy, which is still solvable also through energy, inside synergy, and thus get nearer and nearer to know dharma. Builder of such things is as much alchemist as much that soul is chemist, sociologist, physician or person specialized to whatever field or structural level we are talking about here.

So, just the case that universal law is sum of it's desires, makes it so that dharma is actually building things, which are supported by interdesire, mutual desire. Karma is actually the effect of some soul having different synergy pattern, which will locate cause from your pattern to anergyze it, and then desire your willpower to weaken, and disorient your desire.

Building our technology, we need all it's functionality, but we can build computers in different ways and from different substances as much as we can built houses, mechanical clocks or watermills from different substances. We must find ways to produce all the functionality following dharma, not by breaking it - effectively making all our Earth a better place, and making it's field into more beautiful field, which is supported by more forces, and making it so that mother Earth would support our technology, not be somewhat destructive towards it, and we ourselves would heal using it, not feel the bad fields surrounding it and discharging our health.

This is what I call love of oneself and others, and all the environment - you must focus on solving your matrix at the same time solving the rest, to a degree possible, and this produces a flow into more and more empowered state in case you constantly use your courage, moving your emotion, thought and body from heart.

This is also the social process. Here is what we have to do:

• Focus on your desire and take it to bare bones, going as deep that you can see it as clearly as possible; find your true desire in it's minimalistic form, and it's all possibilities - the states, the "equation", which is core root of your happiness.
• Focus on surroundings and take in all their desire, in it's deepest form available to you.
• Focus on surroundings and parts of their desires, which are not as deep, but which they see as "solutions", and accept them, too - you can solve them only by logic, which is coherent with how they learn, and this might be a slow, but steady process, because every thing has it's own way and you can effectively inspire them only when accepting this way and all the odd things they need to be sure that something really is desirable to them.
• Now, put those things together - your will and effect of surroundings, take all energy impulses in, because they are all the hints for you, how you should behave. Now, take those two (yin and yang) side by side in your mind, and start at the same time energizing them and keeping them close together. Intensify the energy and also their closeness - like magnets, they might not want to stay together at first. Intensify them to exactly the same level, so that one will not "win" another, them keep energizing, until you feel like energizing one thing, not two; make them closer ..at some moment, your mind will internally find the genuine solution, that indeed, this paradox solves and you can both fully fulfill your true desire and be in flow with surroundings; this will be somewhat "orgasmic" moment. This will last, in this lifetime and in future - you have found a soul matrix solution, which synergizes some aspect of you and surroundings, and thus you have higher synergy with it; as synergy transcends energy, you have more effective energy of yourself, because no tension and counter-desire stops the flow anymore.
• There is another way, not mind-based and visualized, but all-chakra technique - take all the energy coming in to your body, accept it all, however painful (anyway, you will be sick if taking so much counter-desire that you can't handle it at the end of this healing session), then make your inner force stronger so that you "clean" your chakras; but don't let the "negative energy" go, because this is a desire you are going to synergize ..make the process stronger and stronger, keeping the outside energy (be it "positive" or "negative", "pleasure" or, for example "fear" or "doubt") in, and intensifying your energetic body process to solve it; ultimately you will be clean, energized, and for now on, this energy is much less pain to you - if you learn to do it with that kind of energy, it will soon become pleasure. Your real-world movement will be synchronized with source of this energy, and this source will be synchronized with you. The feeling, which should be utilized, is eternal love, the higher love - or some deeper kind of love, for example, goodwill for everything, because your mission is to make the process of your own be synchronized with the process of other in such way that your deepest desire is completely fulfilled, and their deepest desire is as fulfilled as you can - hopefully completely fulfilled; it can also trigger a flow of events, which will "materialize" this state so that your interactions will lead to complete fulfillment, when you move by heart, if some told-out words or actions are needed in addition to this energetic process (which can, as well, be enough, but usually the synergy adds some nuances to your movement in real world, and to their movements, too).

In synergy-based philosophy we don't need to "conquer", we don't need to "receive" - surroundings will be in sync with you without needing you to keep them in "conquered" state with your yang, but utilizing yin+yang, the tao, you just be in flow and the flow is a pleasure, and as more you advance as greater, stronger, and more purified higher-love state is the flow, and the love can be expressing as hot, powerful burning inside, or soft pleasure, or simple luckiness and inner joy, there are hundreds of forms - actually as many forms as your creativity can build -, but it will indeed all be a pleasure; and building this love, you can feel fear, you can feel many "negative things", but through transforming them, you get higher and higher states - and because you have taken care of exergy, it forms synergy, which is equilibrium state with not much energy needed to not fall back (you must just keep yourself in flow and the process as much as possible).

You enter your dream to the whole, others enter theirs, and the whole will find a solution of all deepest dreams coming true in the same world; keep sure that you also synthesize higher will and will of Earth (wishes of people and will of heaven, as I Ching states that), because then your willpower is ultimately intensified and you intensify the willpower of others, who are in synergy with you. The state of energy will grow, and it will grow into levels you cant imagine; into the levels others will not believe if you tell them! Just pure luck and joy, together with courage, where you are ready to sacrifice yourself - but in Alliance of Love, everyone can sacrifice themselves for higher, and this state we all see in everyone, who reached that, and through that, actually the outer force will sacrifice much less of people in that; actually, for the highest love forms, nothing will be sacrificed - because why should the omnipresent force sacrifice any part of itself, which is healthy and feels good, and builds more and more wealth and love around it through endless creativity and powerfully following the tao? You enter your dreams, the synergy matrix will solve it, and your heart and mind will tell you, how to move - you just wish and then move by intuition, and if your desire is in harmony, it's supported; non-harmonious desire is like black magic - you desire, the effect will come for as long as you can keep your desire strong, but eventually it will go down and surroundings will turn it back and try to take measures, on energetic level, so that you would experience some good luck first, but then strong bad luck, a lesson of karma, and disempowerment hard to get over; sometimes, you can't synergize as well - then, you will experience some depression, a solution process, but with good will, eventually solve it and feel more in flow than ever, because you have solved some complex part of karma.

Being experienced, you can go deeper, into collective unconscious (do za-zen with strong desire to know yourself, then you also get to know others and clarify your senses), and solve fears and doubts in it, so that you start inspiring the whole world and may become famous and rich, if you accept it, and definitely you can make some positive change, solving the problems of collective unconsious inside yourself - all those problems are conflicts of interests, or conflicts of interests of humans and harmony of nature, and the method given here, which you can develop further, will be a starting point to really becoming a generator of synergy, the ultimate force. Feeling, which activates the generator and leads it's working in the best way, is love - love for all beings, and shielded love for all beings, which also feel the higher love as strongly, or are moving towards this experience by their strong desire. Once you get to know that, it will be the greatest pleasure you know, and you are ready to do it just for experiencing the process, with all the fears and doubts you take into, and with all the love and synergy you create. Here it's visible, that love is the highest power - it does not generate energy, being dependent on external sources to deplete (force into anergy), but it generates synergy, which transcends energy. Your soul becomes more and more trained, morally trained, and your auric field starts keeping things in order, according to dharma, around you without you even noticing that; and the surrounding reality will give you more and more good luck and hidden possibilities you can sense and step into. It will be a journey - a journey of love and adventure!